![]() ![]() Maybe I had too high of hopes for it, or perhaps I just expected a different kind of story, or maybe, just maybe, the book is unnecessarily overhyped. The main reason I am giving this two stars is that I honestly just did not enjoy reading this book. In my opinion, took away from the point of the story: to tell where Agatha really was when she disappeared. I don't want to delve too far into those out of fear of spoiling things.Ībout 70% of the entire story was either boring, or full of useless information, including a lot of Nan's background that had little to do with the main story. ![]() There are a lot of plot-holes and certain events that don't entirely make sense. (I'm aware this is fiction, but it still needs to be believable). ![]() Plus, from what we are led to understand right off the bat, Nan didn't actually know Agatha that well. It is told from the perspective of her husband's mistress. ![]() Also, how are we supposed to believe that what happened to Agatha is entirely true. rarefied world of author Agatha Christie and her husband, Archie. Yes, she admits on several occasions that she wasn't actually there for some of the events that took place and that her account is merely guesswork, but doing so takes away from the story significantly. Because the story is told from Nan's point of view, there are parts of the story that seem extremely far-fetched. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |